🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 542+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

25 random focal beads

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.4 out of 5(542 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$25
$41.67
Sale
βœ“ no-cost shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

You will receive 25 random focal beads- none of these have ever been usedNo duplicatesFrom non smoking home

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping

↩️
easy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

25 random focal beads

You will receive 25 random focal beads- none of these have ever been used
No duplicates
From non smoking home

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 41773

Category: Vintage > Supplies > Bead

Original Price:$41.67 USD

Sale Price:$25 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5512 reviews
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
After a few days, the 25 random focal beads works as described so it’s acceptable. Arrived on time.
28 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Detroit, MI

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb investment
Nice design and decent 25 random focal beads.
48 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
certainly impressed
From my experience, it does the job so I’m okay with it.
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Impressed!
So far, the 25 random focal beads is user-friendly to use so I’m okay with it.
42 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 day ago Β· brand-new York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
splendid 25 random focal beads!
the 25 random focal beads feels okay so it’s acceptable.
36 people found this helpful